The Oscar-winning actress Reveals Why She Didn't Use an Intimacy Coordinator on Latest Project Die My Love
The acclaimed actress has joined the growing list of performers who voice skepticism about the essential need of on-set intimacy professionals, revealing she opted against their services while filming her latest project Die My Love.
Understanding the Role of On-Set Intimacy Professionals
On-set intimacy professionals emerged following the #MeToo era to ensure the security and comfort of performers during sequences involving partial undress and sexual content. Yet, numerous prominent actors including Jennifer Aniston and other established stars have expressed reservations about their presence, with some suggesting they interfere with creative flow.
Lawrence's Personal Experience
Speaking during the popular culture podcast, while promoting her new film where she plays a woman descending into mental health challenges, Lawrence commented: "We chose not to use such a professional, or maybe we had the option but didn't really utilize them... I felt completely safe with Rob."
She elaborated: "He is completely professional and deeply devoted to his partner. What we discussed mostly revolved around family life and relationships. There was never uncomfortable moments or questions about personal boundaries."
"If there was even a hint of discomfort, I would have insisted on an intimacy coordinator. Many male actors get upset if you don't reciprocate their advances, and subsequently the retaliation starts. He was not like that."
Industry Recognition and Ongoing Debate
Recently, entertainment database IMDb formally acknowledged on-set intimacy professionals as a separate category, together with eleven other crew positions including choreography, craft services, and puppetry. Previously, they were grouped under "additional crew" instead of having their own designation.
Notwithstanding this validation, intimacy coordinators continue to face public discussion implying they might not be industry essential, with high-profile performers rejecting their participation. Jennifer's viewpoint mirrors that of Jennifer Aniston, who earlier revealed she declined intimacy coordination while working with her co-star on their television series.
Jennifer's Perspective
"He proved to be such a gentleman – I mean every move, every cut, 'Are you OK?" she remembered. "It was additionally carefully planned. That's the benefit of working with skilled editors, appropriate music. So, minimal preparation is needed."
Aniston continued, "They offered, 'Having someone check if you're comfortable,' and I responded, 'Honestly, this is awkward enough!' We're seasoned actors – we can manage appropriately. And we had Mimi present."
Other Examples and Industry Reaction
Despite featuring numerous scenes of intimate moments and regular undress, the award-winning film – Sean Baker's Oscar-winning project about a adult entertainer and a Russian oligarch's son – filmed without an on-set professional.
Mikey Madison explained she and co-star Mark Eydelshteyn "concluded it would be best to maintain privacy."
"My character is a sex worker, and I had studied the director's work and recognized his dedication to realism. I was mentally prepared for it. As an performer, I treated it as professional work."
Her comments generated significant backlash from intimacy coordinators, similar to the response to another actress's recent comments, who earlier this year shared that filming her forthcoming project Marty Supreme marked her initial experience with the relatively new profession, which she "did not know existed."
Gwyneth's Viewpoint
When asked about personal ease with a specific move alongside co-star Timothée Chalamet, the actress responded: "I'm from the generation where you get naked, you get in bed, the filming begins."
She continued that she and Chalamet then informed the coordinator: "We think we're good. You can step back.' I don't know how it is for newer performers, but... if someone is instructing, '{OK, then he's going to place his hand here,' I would feel, as an artist, extremely restricted by that."
Industry Response
After these statements, former Channel 4 drama head Caroline Hollick labeled them "irresponsible" and highlighted that most of those speaking against these professionals possess sufficient fame to maintain personal authority and security on production locations.
"Occasionally an actor shares opinions about whether they appreciate on-set professionals or not," commented the executive. "The actress stated she grew up in a time when people in Hollywood 'took our kit off and proceeded professionally'. As a established actress in Hollywood performing alongside a man considerably junior than her, while I'm sure Chalamet is chill, I found it somewhat concerning statement."
Male Perspective
Michael Douglas, in contrast, shared that he feels the primary responsibility during heterosexual sex scenes rests with the male performer, rather than a third party.
"In my experience, you assume duty as the man to make certain the woman is comfortable, you talk through completely," he said. "You communicate, '{OK, I'm going to make contact there if that's agreeable'. It's extremely careful but seems like it's happening naturally, which is ideally what convincing acting looks like."